For wardens, IT and program staff
Nothing new to run. Everything on record.
AIAPQ adds legal research, and draft output prepared from it, to a channel you already operate. Answers and drafts are screened against your rules before they are delivered, and every decision leaves a record.
Who to contact
For a pilot, a policy review, or the record format for your audit process, write to service@aiapq.com and name your facility, the messaging system you run, and the staff role handling the request.
Residents: ask your legal or program staff whether AIAPQ is switched on at your facility.
What the facility gets
-
Screening before delivery
Every outgoing message — a research answer or a requested draft — is checked against your communication policy and the channel's rules before it reaches the resident. If screening cannot finish, the message is not delivered.
-
No new endpoint
AIAPQ is designed to need no new address for your team to open, firewall or monitor. AIAPQ rides the messaging system already in place, and the resident needs no new hardware.
-
A full record
You can see what was sent, when it was sent, and what was edited to comply. The marked Edited Version label on a delivered message matches the record.
-
Your rules, cited
Screening is configured from your own posted rules. You can point at the rule behind any edit, in your own words and numbering.
How screening works
-
A message is written
The research answer, or the requested draft, is prepared by researching the law for that question; every statute, case and source it relies on is cited.
-
It is checked against your policy
The second assistant reads the outgoing text against your policy and the channel's rules.
-
Pass, and it goes out unchanged
No rewrite, no redaction, no change of meaning.
-
Fail, and it is rewritten and labeled
The message is rewritten to comply and delivered with Edited Version at the top. The edit and its reason are logged.
What it is not
AIAPQ is legal research and draft output for the resident. It is not legal advice, it is not a lawyer, and it does not take the place of counsel. It does not decide cases and it does not advise a plea. Drafts it writes are demonstration material and are not intended for filing without an attorney's review. Facilities should treat it as a research-and-drafting tool in the same class as a law library terminal.